GO CRAPS strategy view showing real-time roll history and flexible betting options.
Connect with us
GO CRAPS strategy view showing real-time roll history and flexible betting options.

Compliance Updates

Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. Files Counterclaim Alleging Violation of Illinois’ Anti-Inducement Law

Published

on

 

Daniel Fischer, the principal owner of the Dotty’s chain of video gaming cafés in Illinois, who is also involved in bids for new casino licenses in Rockford and Calumet City, paid just $2 million in 2018 to expand his network by purchasing 63 lucrative Stella’s and Shelby’s video gaming establishments, according to a newly disclosed counterclaim filed by Gold Rush Amusements. At the same time, Midwest SRO, LLC, a terminal operator that already serviced Dotty’s establishments, allegedly paid an additional $44.5 million to Stella’s and Shelby’s owners as part of a calculated sham transaction. The filing alleges that Midwest SRO’s payment violated the Illinois Gaming Act because it constituted an improper inducement to replace Gold Rush as the terminal operator in 44 of the Stella’s and Shelby’s locations.

Disclosure statements filed last summer with the Illinois Gaming Board identified Gordon Sondland as holding an interest of five percent or more in Illinois Café and Service Company, LLC (ICSC), Fischer’s company that owns the Dotty’s chain in Illinois. Sondland, an Oregon hotel developer who recently served as President Trump’s Ambassador to the European Union, was a key witness who changed his testimony in the President’s impeachment proceedings.

The newly disclosed court documents resulted from a Cook County judge’s order lifting confidentiality designations that had previously hamstrung Gold Rush Amusements, Inc., and its executive Rick Heidner from knowing and revealing the details of the alleged sham transaction involving ICSC, Midwest SRO, and Laredo Hospitality Ventures, LLC, the parent company of Stella’s and Shelby’s. The ruling allows Gold Rush and Heidner, for the first time, to fully learn and publicly disclose the details of the transaction, including the allegedly improper inducement paid by Midwest SRO, a Gold Rush competitor.

“Gold Rush has compelling evidence that the Transaction was the culmination of a multi-year, concerted effort between and among Midwest SRO, ICSC, and Laredo (and their principals) to replace the Gold Rush Contracts with contracts benefitting Midwest SRO,” Gold Rush alleges in the newly unmasked court document.

Under state law, establishments and terminal operators must equally split 67 percent of a machine’s profits, while the remaining one-third goes to state and local taxes. In fiscal year 2019, Illinois’ 32,000 video gaming terminals yielded nearly $1.6 billion in net revenue.

A nine-page ruling lifting the document’s confidentiality on March 13 by Cook County Circuit Associate Judge Sanjay T. Tailor also favors the public’s right of access to court documents.

“Equity demands that Gold Rush be permitted to publicly make its claims of wrongdoing against the Establishments and Midwest, and their respective principals, just as the Establishments and Midwest have publicly made their claims of wrongdoing against Gold Rush,” Judge Tailor wrote.

The ruling involves Gold Rush’s counterclaims against 44 Stella’s and Shelby’s gaming cafes in which Gold Rush began accumulating agreements to place its video gaming terminals in 2013. Those 44 establishments sued Gold Rush in early 2019 to terminate the contracts. A year later, Gold Rush filed its counterclaims and additional claims against Fischer, the other principals, and the companies that were involved in the November 2018 transaction, which purported to change ownership of all 63 Stella’s and Shelby’s establishments in suburbs surrounding Chicago. Until now, the details of Gold Rush’s allegation that the parties engaged in an improper sham transaction were shielded by a court protective order that allowed the opposing parties to designate key documents relating to the transaction as “attorneys eyes only,” meaning that Gold Rush’s counsel could not even share the documents with their client.

Now fully public, Gold Rush’s counterclaim alleges that Midwest SRO, and its principal, Allyson Estey, paid more than $44.5 million ― or 95.7% of the value of the deal ― to Laredo, the parent company of Stella’s and Shelby’s, and one of its owners, Gary Leff. The filing alleges that Midwest SRO’s payment was part of a conspiracy to oust Gold Rush as the terminal operator and place Midwest SRO’s video gaming terminals in 44 of the establishments.

Advertisement
Stake - Best Online Casino & Sports Betting Platform

At the same time, Fischer’s ICSC, which operates Dotty’s in Illinois, paid just $2,000,001 ― or 4.3% of the deal’s overall value ― to purchase Laredo’s actual assets and cafés, which generate substantial revenue from video gaming. Fischer became involved in Dotty’s when he and his former business partner, Marwin Hofer, purchased Dotty’s Oregon establishments from the chain’s founder, Craig Estey, who is Allyson Estey’s father.

Hofer, a South Dakota businessman, was the initial managing member of a South Dakota limited liability company that continues to hold an interest of five percent or more in Fischer’s ICSC, as does a living trust in the name of Hofer’s wife. Hofer was convicted of federal wire fraud in 2017. The offices of Fischer’s ICSC and Allyson Estey’s Midwest SRO are housed in adjacent business suites in suburban Bensenville.

When the designated confidential documents were produced in the litigation last summer, Gold Rush’s attorneys began to unravel the complex sham transaction. The documents revealed that Leff had agreed to be bound by restrictive covenants that did not exist until the day of the transaction, and Midwest SRO purchased those covenants from Laredo for more than $34.6 million. Leff was also allowed to retain unspecified intellectual property valued at $9.85 million. There was no indication of how the restrictive covenants or intellectual property values were calculated. Leff further received a 10 percent interest in Midwest SRO and the right to have his interest redeemed for $9.85 million approximately a year after the transaction. At the same time, Fischer’s ICSC purportedly purchased the Laredo establishments for $1, and paid just $2 million to acquire the outstanding interests in Laredo.

Gold Rush’s complaint names Fischer, Leff, Allyson Estey, and Charity Johns, who was Laredo’s CEO and became CEO of Fischer’s ICSC, as defendants. The counterclaims and complaint allege that those individuals and their companies ― ICSC, Midwest SRO, and Laredo ― conspired for years to evade the legal restrictions separating establishments, on one hand, and terminal operators, on the other hand. After previously failing to accomplish so-called vertical integration, first through legislation and then litigation, Gold Rush’s adversaries allegedly tried a third route ― conspiring in an improper deal in which Midwest SRO paid an improper inducement to be installed as the terminal operator for all of the Laredo establishments, supplanting Gold Rush in the process.

Judge Tailor’s ruling observed that the opposing parties had repeatedly emphasized their disclosure of the transaction details to the Illinois Gaming Board, “as if to suggest they had obtained its blessing.” However, the IGB did not bless or approve the transaction, the judge noted, but rather said only, in an October 2018 letter, that the state’s video gaming act and rules did not allow the IGB to prohibit the transaction.

Gold Rush also claims that its adversaries provided select or mischaracterized information to the IGB to portray Gold Rush as attempting to disrupt the transaction after it was completed, which became the basis of a disciplinary complaint against Gold Rush. At the time, however, Gold Rush’s Heidner did not know the details of the transaction or that Fischer’s ICSC had paid only $2 million for Laredo’s assets and cafés.

Gold Rush’s counterclaims allege breach of contract, tortious interference with contracts and prospective business advantage, and civil conspiracy. Gold Rush seeks unspecified damages for harm to its business and reputation, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs.

 

SOURCE Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.

 

Advertisement
Stake - Best Online Casino & Sports Betting Platform

Compliance Updates

MGCB Issues Cease-and-Desist Orders to Six Illegal Online Gambling Operators

Published

on

 

In a continued effort to safeguard Michigan residents and uphold the integrity of its regulated gaming environment, the Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB) has issued cease-and-desist orders to six online gambling operators unlawfully offering services in the state.

The named entities—Bonus Blitz Casino, DomGame, Royal Ace Casino, Slots Capital, Supernova Casino, and Wins Mania—have been found providing internet-based gambling without obtaining the necessary state authorization, violating Michigan’s Lawful Internet Gaming Act, the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act, and sections of the Michigan Penal Code.

“These illegal operators often masquerade as legitimate gaming platforms, but they exist entirely outside the legal safeguards that protect consumers. When Michiganders play on unlicensed sites, they’re placing their personal and financial security at risk—with little to no recourse if things go wrong,” said Henry Williams, Executive Director of the MGCB.

Unlike Michigan-licensed gaming platforms—which undergo rigorous vetting, continuous monitoring, and must comply with strict state regulations—these unlicensed operators are not authorized to offer gaming services in the state. Some are based outside the US, operating beyond the reach of U.S. regulatory oversight, while others may claim domestic ties but still fail to meet Michigan’s legal and licensing requirements.

Because they operate without state approval, these entities do not follow Michigan’s consumer protection standards, responsible gaming mandates, or transparent dispute resolution procedures designed to ensure fair play and data security.

“This action sends a clear message to illegal operators: Michigan is not a place for rogue gambling. We are committed to preserving a safe, legal, and accountable gaming landscape—and that includes rooting out bad actors who threaten the trust we’ve built with consumers,” Williams said.

Continue Reading

Compliance Updates

Responsible Online Gaming Association Releases Guidelines for Operator VIP Programs

Published

on

Responsible Online Gaming Association Releases Guidelines for Operator VIP Programs

 

The Responsible Online Gaming Association (ROGA), an independent association representing 90% of the legal U.S. sports betting industry by handle, published its guidelines for operator VIP programs. These evidence-based recommended practices are intended to support members’ VIP policies to further incorporate robust responsible online gaming. These can help players maintain a balanced, enjoyable gaming experience within their own personal limits.

“Like in many sectors of entertainment, leisure and hospitality, sportsbook’s VIP programs aim to reward and retain loyal players, and it is essential that these programs are operated with a strong commitment to responsible gaming. These programs should support a shared understanding between hosts and players on the value of responsible gaming that fosters long-term loyalty and player well-being. There is a robust conversation ongoing regarding VIP programs, which is why we have prioritized this issue, as it is essential to provide research-driven guidance to adequately support these programs to help keep VIP players’ experience fun and recreational,” said ROGA Executive Director, Dr. Jennifer Shatley.

Guided by existing evidence, ROGA found that the most effective VIP programs combine proactive education, personalized engagement, and periodic program evaluation. Pursuing these objectives, ROGA identified the following recommended practices for operating VIP programs, many of which have already been implemented by some operators:

• Role-specific Training for VIP Hosts: Provide ongoing education specifically tailored to the unique needs of VIP Hosts.

• Automated Review: Operators will take advantage of technology to attempt to detect potentially risky behavioral patterns among VIP players, such as increased deposit frequency, extended play sessions, or repeated failed withdrawal attempts.

• Escalation Process: Operators will implement measures to escalate to a responsible gaming specialist when the operator identifies that a player might be exhibiting potential signs of problematic play. The specialist should conduct a review of the player’s behavior and take appropriate action on a case-by-case basis, such as connecting with trained behavioral health personnel.

• Integrate RG Messaging into VIP Communications: Communicate responsible gaming messages to VIP players using a range of tailored engagement channels.

• VIP Engagement Protocols: Establish protocols to guide interactions between VIP hosts and VIP players, with a focus on transparency, support, and responsible gaming.

• Promotions, Bonuses, and Incentives: VIP Hosts should not offer any VIP promotions, bonuses, or incentives to VIP players who are on a cool-off period, have self-excluded, or have a suspended or banned account, and must also provide all VIP players with the ability to opt out of receiving such incentives.

Advertisement
Stake - Best Online Casino & Sports Betting Platform

• Making Data Available: Provide VIP players with access to player data that show player activity, including deposits, wagers, and withdrawals.

• Confirm Awareness of Tools: Require VIP players to confirm their familiarity with responsible gaming tools and resources upon onboarding.

• RG Education for VIP Players: Regularly provide VIP players with responsible gaming educational materials to support responsible gaming behavior.

• Regular Program Evaluation: Conduct annual reviews of the VIP program. This can include feedback from both VIP players and VIP hosts, as well as tracking the success of engagement strategies.

• Development and Updates: Operators should keep apprised of new tools and methods for responsible gaming as they are developed.

This non-exhaustive list of recommended practices is a critical step toward further supporting these programs. ROGA’s members have independently made the decision to commit to implementing these guidelines within a commercially reasonable timeframe.

With its members’ support, ROGA continues to identify and publish research-based recommended practices for responsible gaming across a variety of priority topics.

Continue Reading

Compliance Updates

Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection Announces Settlement with High5Games over Operation of Illegal Online Casino

Published

on

Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection Announces Settlement with High5Games over Operation of Illegal Online Casino

 

The Department of Consumer Protection Gaming Division announced a settlement with Online Gaming Service Provider, High5Games, following an investigation into the licensee’s operation of an unlicensed online casino, High5Casino.

High5Games is a licensed service provider that develops and provides online slot content for the legal gaming platforms in Connecticut. High5Games license was summarily suspended on March 14, 2025, for alleged violations of Connecticut’s gaming laws.

High5Games has ceased operation of its online casino in Connecticut, and its Online Gaming Service Provider license has been reinstated, effective May 22.

High5Games has agreed to pay nearly $1.5 million as part of the settlement. That includes more than $643,000 in restitution to consumers who lost money to High5Casino, and nearly $800,000 for use in consumer complaint resolution programs, consumer education, consumer protection enforcement and litigation.

“This case is just one example of the hard work our Gaming Division does to ensure a fair, safe and legal gaming market in Connecticut. We are pleased the Connecticut consumers who were lured into placing wagers on an unlicensed platform will be made whole, and that this company has ceased operations of its unlicensed casino in Connecticut,” said DCP Commissioner Bryan T. Cafferelli.

“We are satisfied with the outcome of this investigation, which has resulted in the return of funds to consumers who were harmed by the unfair marketing of an unlicensed sweepstakes casino. If you’re going to gamble, Connecticut is the best state to place a wager. We work hard to ensure fairness in our licensed market, and when violations do occur, we make every effort to make sure consumers are made whole,” said DCP Gaming Division Director Kris Gilman.

Continue Reading

Trending

GamingAmericas.com (part of HIPTHER) is your one-stop portal for the latest news, insights, and analyses in the gaming industry across the Americas. From legislative updates and market trends to interviews with industry leaders, we provide a comprehensive look at the dynamic landscape of both online and land-based gaming. Whether you're a stakeholder looking to stay ahead of the curve or a gaming enthusiast eager for reliable updates, GamingAmericas.com has got you covered. Follow us on social media and subscribe to our newsletter for real-time updates and exclusive content. Make informed decisions and stay ahead in the game with GamingAmericas.com.

Disclaimer: All the information provided is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Always check your local laws before participating in any gaming activities.

Copyright © 2018 – 2025, HIPTHER. All Rights Reserved.