Compliance Updates
Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. Files Counterclaim Alleging Violation of Illinois’ Anti-Inducement Law
Daniel Fischer, the principal owner of the Dotty’s chain of video gaming cafés in Illinois, who is also involved in bids for new casino licenses in Rockford and Calumet City, paid just $2 million in 2018 to expand his network by purchasing 63 lucrative Stella’s and Shelby’s video gaming establishments, according to a newly disclosed counterclaim filed by Gold Rush Amusements. At the same time, Midwest SRO, LLC, a terminal operator that already serviced Dotty’s establishments, allegedly paid an additional $44.5 million to Stella’s and Shelby’s owners as part of a calculated sham transaction. The filing alleges that Midwest SRO’s payment violated the Illinois Gaming Act because it constituted an improper inducement to replace Gold Rush as the terminal operator in 44 of the Stella’s and Shelby’s locations.
Disclosure statements filed last summer with the Illinois Gaming Board identified Gordon Sondland as holding an interest of five percent or more in Illinois Café and Service Company, LLC (ICSC), Fischer’s company that owns the Dotty’s chain in Illinois. Sondland, an Oregon hotel developer who recently served as President Trump’s Ambassador to the European Union, was a key witness who changed his testimony in the President’s impeachment proceedings.
The newly disclosed court documents resulted from a Cook County judge’s order lifting confidentiality designations that had previously hamstrung Gold Rush Amusements, Inc., and its executive Rick Heidner from knowing and revealing the details of the alleged sham transaction involving ICSC, Midwest SRO, and Laredo Hospitality Ventures, LLC, the parent company of Stella’s and Shelby’s. The ruling allows Gold Rush and Heidner, for the first time, to fully learn and publicly disclose the details of the transaction, including the allegedly improper inducement paid by Midwest SRO, a Gold Rush competitor.
“Gold Rush has compelling evidence that the Transaction was the culmination of a multi-year, concerted effort between and among Midwest SRO, ICSC, and Laredo (and their principals) to replace the Gold Rush Contracts with contracts benefitting Midwest SRO,” Gold Rush alleges in the newly unmasked court document.
Under state law, establishments and terminal operators must equally split 67 percent of a machine’s profits, while the remaining one-third goes to state and local taxes. In fiscal year 2019, Illinois’ 32,000 video gaming terminals yielded nearly $1.6 billion in net revenue.
A nine-page ruling lifting the document’s confidentiality on March 13 by Cook County Circuit Associate Judge Sanjay T. Tailor also favors the public’s right of access to court documents.
“Equity demands that Gold Rush be permitted to publicly make its claims of wrongdoing against the Establishments and Midwest, and their respective principals, just as the Establishments and Midwest have publicly made their claims of wrongdoing against Gold Rush,” Judge Tailor wrote.
The ruling involves Gold Rush’s counterclaims against 44 Stella’s and Shelby’s gaming cafes in which Gold Rush began accumulating agreements to place its video gaming terminals in 2013. Those 44 establishments sued Gold Rush in early 2019 to terminate the contracts. A year later, Gold Rush filed its counterclaims and additional claims against Fischer, the other principals, and the companies that were involved in the November 2018 transaction, which purported to change ownership of all 63 Stella’s and Shelby’s establishments in suburbs surrounding Chicago. Until now, the details of Gold Rush’s allegation that the parties engaged in an improper sham transaction were shielded by a court protective order that allowed the opposing parties to designate key documents relating to the transaction as “attorneys eyes only,” meaning that Gold Rush’s counsel could not even share the documents with their client.
Now fully public, Gold Rush’s counterclaim alleges that Midwest SRO, and its principal, Allyson Estey, paid more than $44.5 million ― or 95.7% of the value of the deal ― to Laredo, the parent company of Stella’s and Shelby’s, and one of its owners, Gary Leff. The filing alleges that Midwest SRO’s payment was part of a conspiracy to oust Gold Rush as the terminal operator and place Midwest SRO’s video gaming terminals in 44 of the establishments.
At the same time, Fischer’s ICSC, which operates Dotty’s in Illinois, paid just $2,000,001 ― or 4.3% of the deal’s overall value ― to purchase Laredo’s actual assets and cafés, which generate substantial revenue from video gaming. Fischer became involved in Dotty’s when he and his former business partner, Marwin Hofer, purchased Dotty’s Oregon establishments from the chain’s founder, Craig Estey, who is Allyson Estey’s father.
Hofer, a South Dakota businessman, was the initial managing member of a South Dakota limited liability company that continues to hold an interest of five percent or more in Fischer’s ICSC, as does a living trust in the name of Hofer’s wife. Hofer was convicted of federal wire fraud in 2017. The offices of Fischer’s ICSC and Allyson Estey’s Midwest SRO are housed in adjacent business suites in suburban Bensenville.
When the designated confidential documents were produced in the litigation last summer, Gold Rush’s attorneys began to unravel the complex sham transaction. The documents revealed that Leff had agreed to be bound by restrictive covenants that did not exist until the day of the transaction, and Midwest SRO purchased those covenants from Laredo for more than $34.6 million. Leff was also allowed to retain unspecified intellectual property valued at $9.85 million. There was no indication of how the restrictive covenants or intellectual property values were calculated. Leff further received a 10 percent interest in Midwest SRO and the right to have his interest redeemed for $9.85 million approximately a year after the transaction. At the same time, Fischer’s ICSC purportedly purchased the Laredo establishments for $1, and paid just $2 million to acquire the outstanding interests in Laredo.
Gold Rush’s complaint names Fischer, Leff, Allyson Estey, and Charity Johns, who was Laredo’s CEO and became CEO of Fischer’s ICSC, as defendants. The counterclaims and complaint allege that those individuals and their companies ― ICSC, Midwest SRO, and Laredo ― conspired for years to evade the legal restrictions separating establishments, on one hand, and terminal operators, on the other hand. After previously failing to accomplish so-called vertical integration, first through legislation and then litigation, Gold Rush’s adversaries allegedly tried a third route ― conspiring in an improper deal in which Midwest SRO paid an improper inducement to be installed as the terminal operator for all of the Laredo establishments, supplanting Gold Rush in the process.
Judge Tailor’s ruling observed that the opposing parties had repeatedly emphasized their disclosure of the transaction details to the Illinois Gaming Board, “as if to suggest they had obtained its blessing.” However, the IGB did not bless or approve the transaction, the judge noted, but rather said only, in an October 2018 letter, that the state’s video gaming act and rules did not allow the IGB to prohibit the transaction.
Gold Rush also claims that its adversaries provided select or mischaracterized information to the IGB to portray Gold Rush as attempting to disrupt the transaction after it was completed, which became the basis of a disciplinary complaint against Gold Rush. At the time, however, Gold Rush’s Heidner did not know the details of the transaction or that Fischer’s ICSC had paid only $2 million for Laredo’s assets and cafés.
Gold Rush’s counterclaims allege breach of contract, tortious interference with contracts and prospective business advantage, and civil conspiracy. Gold Rush seeks unspecified damages for harm to its business and reputation, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs.
SOURCE Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.
Peru and Brazil to provide launchpad for Latam expansion as ThrillTech strengthens presence in emerging regulated markets
ThrillTech, the B2B jackpot specialist, has taken a significant step forward in its international growth strategy after securing a B2B licence in Peru and regulatory certification in Brazil.
The approvals clear the path for ThrillTech to launch its proprietary player-funded jackpot solutions in Latin America for the first time, bringing its flagship ThrillPots product to one of the world’s most exciting and emerging regions for iGaming.
Latin America has become a focal point for operators in recent years, with Brazil’s market liberalisation and Peru’s structured regulatory framework, as set out by the country’s ministry of foreign trade and tourism (MINCETUR), providing fertile ground for innovative engagement tools.
By working tirelessly to secure entry into both countries, ThrillTech is positioning itself to support operators with compliant, performance-driven jackpot mechanics that can drive revenue and enhance retention.
Peter Mares, CTO and co-founder of ThrillTech, said: “Expanding into Latin America is a milestone moment for us. The region is bursting with opportunity, but it also demands solutions that are flexible, transparent, and built to scale. With a licence in Peru and certification in Brazil, we are ready to deliver the same measurable revenue impact to operators in Latam that we’ve already proven in Europe.
ThrillTech’s products are designed to provide operators with new revenue streams through side-bet jackpots, while also offering real-time engagement mechanics via cash-only rewards.
Already integrated with multiple tier-one operators in Europe, ThrillTech is now primed to replicate that success in Latam by delivering regulator-approved solutions to local operators.
Compliance Updates
MGCB Renews Licenses for Detroit’s Three Commercial Casinos, Highlighting Continued Community and Economic Impact
The Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB) unanimously approved license renewals for Detroit’s three commercial casinos—MGM Grand Detroit, MotorCity Casino, and Hollywood Casino at Greektown—during its regularly scheduled public board meeting.
The annual approval follows a comprehensive review of each casino’s operations, regulatory compliance, and commitment to responsible gaming practices, as required under the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act. The decision ensures that Detroit residents and visitors can continue to enjoy a safe, secure, and well-regulated gaming environment.
“Detroit’s commercial casinos are not only entertainment destinations but also major contributors to the city and state economies. By renewing these licenses, the Board reaffirms its commitment to a gaming industry that promotes integrity, accountability, and community benefit. Our oversight helps ensure that patrons have a fair and responsible experience, while Michigan residents continue to see the economic value generated by casino revenues,” said MGCB Executive Director Henry Williams.
The Detroit casinos play a vital role in supporting public services through wagering and sports betting taxes. Licensees are taxed at a rate of 19% on adjusted gross receipts, with 8.1% going to the state and 10.9% to the City of Detroit, along with development agreement payments. Casinos also pay an 8.4% tax on retail sports betting qualified adjusted gross receipts and annual fees that support the state’s regulatory functions. These funds help sustain city services, economic development, and state initiatives.
The MGCB also emphasized the importance of small business participation in the casino supply chain, with measures in place to broaden opportunities for local vendors and suppliers.
Each of Detroit’s three casinos will be eligible for renewal again in September 2026.
After securing entry into its second US state, and with a third firmly in sight, RubyPlay is sharpening its compliance strategy to balance speed with precision. Amanda Slonzon, VP of Compliance and Regulatory Strategy, explains how the company’s US Playbook is helping to turn regulation into a growth engine, from leveraging New Jersey as a benchmark, to preparing for Pennsylvania’s unique challenges, and building trust-based relationships with regulators and partners across the industry.
When people think about compliance in the US iGaming industry, they often imagine it as the handbrake that slows expansion and stifles innovation. For me, it is the opposite as compliance sits in the driver’s seat. It is not simply a support function but a product in itself that enables us to grow faster, enter new markets with confidence and strengthen our relationships across the industry.
The US online casino market is both highly promising and highly fragmented. Only seven states currently regulate iGaming and each has its own framework. Navigating this landscape requires a deep understanding of both the common threads between states and the subtle differences that can make or break a market entry.
This is why we have developed a US Playbook at RubyPlay, which is a detailed, in-house framework for understanding and applying state-by-state requirements in a way that is tailored to our products and infrastructure. With it, our compliance and regulatory specialists break down each regulation, interpret it in the context of our business, and share that knowledge across the company.
Market comparisons
New Jersey will always be the starting point for most operators and suppliers entering the US. It was the pioneer of state-level regulation and, in many ways, still sets the standard for others to follow. Meeting New Jersey’s requirements ensures a company is well-prepared for other states, many of which recognise its certifications. Delaware, for example, places direct reliance on New Jersey approvals, a pragmatic approach that can streamline entry for those already licensed in the Garden state. But even with these efficiencies, each state demands its own level of preparation and adaptation.
Regulators in the US take compliance very seriously and ensure that every technical aspect of a business meets their requirements. Unlike some EU markets, where providers may not need a B2B license, every US state requires B2B licensing through a thorough, state-specific process. While major shifts are rare, when they occur they can significantly impact the industry. Right now, sweepstakes is the most talked-about development, and with New Jersey’s Governor having recently signed the ban into law, we are seeing a wave of prohibition that will have a major impact across the industry. Our role is to remain attentive, follow changes daily, and ensure we stay as compliant as we intend to be.
Every state also has its own technical standards, licensing requirements, tax structures, and approaches to product approval. For example, Pennsylvania applies the highest tax rate on operators in the country yet remains one of the most attractive among operators. It also has a deeply ingrained gaming culture and a large, active player base. Entering a state like Pennsylvania, which is a key target for RubyPlay in 2026, is not just about passing compliance checks but more about understanding the regulator’s expectations, the market’s economic realities and the cultural context of its players.
Fostering close relationships
One of the most important aspects of operating in the US is the strength of relationships with key stakeholders across the entire ecosystem. I have always believed that a strong relationship with the regulator is just as critical as meeting their requirements on paper. We work to ensure that regulators see us as partners who bring solutions, not problems. We communicate openly and demonstrate that we take their rules as seriously as they do. The same process applies to how we work alongside our industry partners. From platform providers or operator customer, we approach every partnership as a collaborative effort to succeed together.
Culture plays a vital role in how we approach regulation. Compliance is considered a technical discipline, but ultimately it is powered by people who care about getting processes and frameworks robust. I am proud to lead a team that is collaborative and solution-oriented. One of my proudest moments recently came during a recruitment process where I was speaking with a candidate for a role within our compliance team. She told me she had been following RubyPlay closely and was so impressed by our company culture, the pride we take in our work and the way we treat our people, that she was willing to relocate to another country just to join the team. It is a real story that speaks to the environment we have built.
Regulation in the US is not going to advance overnight. The state-by-state approach will remain and evolve, and new product categories will emerge that challenge existing frameworks. My perspective is that the companies who thrive will be the ones who embrace this complexity, invest in understanding it deeply, and treat compliance as a strategic asset rather than an operational hurdle.
The US Playbook we have developed is our way of making that happen. It is an ever-evolving strategy that keeps us compliant, competitive and ready for whatever comes next.
-
Gaming6 days agoMonster Energy and Call of Duty Unite Again with Exclusive In-Game Rewards and Expanded Program Timing
-
Canada6 days agoabsolutebet Secures AGCO Registration as an Internet Gaming Operator in Ontario
-
Latest News6 days agoWoodbine partners with 1/ST for Pegasus World Cup Filly & Mare Turf Qualifier
-
Gambling in the USA7 days agoAristocrat Interactive™ to Showcase Innovative iLottery Solutions at NASPL 2025 Annual Conference & Trade Show
-
Latest News6 days agoPlaza Hotel & Casino Partners with Aristocrat Gaming™ debuts Downtown’s First Buffalo & Mo’ Friends™ Slot Area Ribbon cutting event and launch of player promotion: Thursday, Sept. 4, 11 a.m
-
Gambling in the USA7 days agoScientific Games Introduces Obsidian, All-Black Holographic Lottery Scratch Games
-
Latest News6 days agoArizona Department of Gaming and Arizona Lottery Announce Proclamation Recognizing September 2025 as Responsible Gaming Education Month
-
Industry News6 days agoStatRankings Launches with Aim to Deliver Faster, Cleaner, and Smarter Sports Data Experience